Showing posts with label astrology horoscope zodiac Zoroastrianism Zoroastrian. Show all posts
Showing posts with label astrology horoscope zodiac Zoroastrianism Zoroastrian. Show all posts

Friday, April 22, 2011

Astrology & Zoroastrianism

Ali Mostofi [ali@alimostofi.com] wrote a while back introducing himself as an astrologer. His blog-site is subtitled: Zoroastrian Stock Market and Current Affairs Astrologer and Commentator. He added "The meanings behind each month (in the Zoroastrian calendar) correspond to astrology." Mr. Mostofi's email prompted us to explore the issue of astrology and Zoroastrianism further, write this response and dedicate a separate blog to the subject.

For more comprehensive information, please see our blog Zoroastrian (Persian) Astrology & Cosmology
_______________________________
References to Zoroastrian Astrology in Hellenic & Roman Texts

Classical Hellenic texts make Zoroaster the inventor of astrology. They also make the Magi, Zoroastrian priests as astrologers. Christians claim the Magi began their journey to visit the Christ-child after observing a particular star or planet in the east (Matthew 2). The latter reference also indicates the standing with which the Magi were perceived - despite derogatory comments of some Classical Hellenic authors.

Neoplatonist philosopher Proclus Lycaeus / Diadochus (412–485 CE) attributed to Zoroaster (Zarathushtra/Zarathustra) a four-volume i.e. papyrus rolls, treatise On Nature (Peri physeos) dedicated to King Cyrus. What we gather from quotes such as the one below is that it contained several astrological references.

Colotes accused Plato of plagiarizing Zoroaster and On Nature since the framework of On Nature's narrative reappears as Plato's Myth of Er, a concluding story in the Republic. Clement of Alexandria, i.e. Titus Flavius Clemens (c.150-215 CE) quotes from On Nature: "These things I wrote, 'I Zoroaster, the son of Armenius, a Pamphylian by birth: having died in battle, and been in Hades, I learned them of the gods'." Fiction but interesting. Clement continues, "This Zoroaster, Plato says, having been placed on the funeral pyre, rose again to life in twelve days. He alludes perchance to the resurrection, or perchance to the fact that the path for souls to ascension lies through the twelve signs of the zodiac; and he himself says, that the descending pathway to birth is the same. In the same way we are to understand the twelve labours of Hercules, after which the soul obtains release from this entire world." The On Nature (Peri physeos)  mentioned by Proclus and Clement of Alexandria does not survive and is known only through references such as the ones above.

We are also informed that while Zoroaster's On Nature had the sun in middle position, while Plato's 4th century BCE version had the sun in second place above the moon.Further, Lydus (6th cent. CE), in On the Months at II.4, attributes the creation of the seven-day week to "the circle of Zoroaster and Hystaspes in Babylon," the basis being that there were then known seven planets.

Heraclides Ponticus wrote a text titled Zoroaster based on Zoroastrian philosophy in order to express his disagreement with Plato on natural philosophy.

Another work circulating under the name of "Zoroaster" was the five-volume i.e. papyrus roll Asteroskopita (or Apotelesmatika). The title and fragments suggest that it was an astrological handbook, "albeit a very varied one, for the making of predictions." A third text attributed to Zoroaster is On Virtue of Stones (Peri lithon timion), of which nothing is known other than its extent (one volume) and that Zoroaster sang it (from which Cumont and Bidez conclude that it was in verse). Numerous other fragments (preserved in the works of other authors) are attributed to Zoroaster, but the titles are not mentioned.

We find it amusing (and this is a good indication of the state of mind of some Hellenic authors) that for some Hellenic authors, the proof that Zoroaster was an astrologer was that his name contained -astr- meaning star! That is, of course, the Greek/Western version of his name, Zoroaster. His authentic name, Zarathushtra, bears no such meaning. Diogenes Laertius (3 cent. CE?), while treating the religion of the magi in very favorable terms and acquiting them of the charge of sinister magic,nevertheless adds his own dose of fantasy by giving the Greek etymology of Zoroaster as derived from 'astrothytes' meaning 'one who sacrifices to the stars' or star-worshipper in short. For others, Zo- when put together with -astra give the combined meaning of living star!! An even more elaborate etymology evolved from some fertile minds, that Zoroaster died by the living (Zo-) flux (-ro-) of fire from the star (-astr-). Zoroaster was then magician enough to have invoked the fire of the star himself. The construct culminated with Zoroaster having been stars by the stars in revenge for their having been restrained by him!!! Buried within all this fantasy is the sentiment that Zoroaster's knowledge of the stars and the heavens - astronomy - was so great that he is seen as having controlled the stars. Suffice it for us to repeat that Zoroaster is a Greek version of the original Avestan name Zarathushtra.

In early Christian literature beginning with the Clementine Homilies 9.4-5, Zoroaster is identified with a parallel series of traditions about Nimrod having been the founder of astrology. In this account, Nimrod is killed by lightning and posthumously deified by the Persians as "Zoroaster, on account of the living (zosan) stream of the star (asteros) being poured upon him."

On a side note, Lydus (On the Months II.4) attributes the creation of the seven-day week to "the circle of Zoroaster and Hystaspes in Babylon," the basis being that there were then seven known planets.

Astronomy in Zoroastrianism
The Magi as Astronomers and Astrologers
The reference of classical Hellenic authors as to Zoroaster and the magi being the inventor of astrology is interesting. Before becoming an astrologer, a person needs to have an understanding of the heavens. The magi were astronomers who understood that the planets were different from the stars, that the planets revolved around the sun, that the planets including the earth were spheres. They identified and named the major planets, stars and constellations and plotted their movements through the heavens to an accuracy of degrees. They also used these movements to establish a very accurate calender based on the solar year and lunar month. Zoroaster is reputed to have built an observatory and amongst it functions was the accurate determination of the equinoxes and solstices, knowledge of which was of great importance to farmers, herders and even to the traders who started and stopped their caravan trains depending on the calendar. The Zoroastrian calendar contained a zodiac.

Zoroastrian Calendar & Zodiac
There are references to the zodiac in the Middle Persian texts related to the organization of the Zoroastrian calendar (see http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/calendar/index.htm#seasons.) Mithraism as it survived amongst the Romans also appears to feature a similar zodiac.

Further in the story of the Zoroastrian escape from Iran to India after the Arab invasion in c. 640 CE - the Kisse Sanjan, - the Zoroastrian priests in the group of refugees consulted their astrological charts before making major decisions.

Astronomy in the Bundahishn, a Zoroastrian Text
The Middle Persian Zoroastrian text, the Bundahishn also contains references to horoscopes and astrology. It's chapter is devoted to astrology and is titled the horoscope of the World. At 5b.12 we have, "In the beginning, when the Adversary entered, it so happened that the dark Sun and Moon could not perpetrate any harm, on account of the contact with the radiance of the Sun and the Moon; and the Seven Bears [Haptoring] and Sataves happened to be of greater vigour than Jupiter and Venus; they disabled Jupiter and Venus from doing harm. For this reason the astrologers call them beneficent. Mars happened to be more vigorous than Antares, and Saturn than the Lord of the Throne; their harmfulness is evident. Therefore, astrologers reckon them as maleficent; and Mercury, who is Apaosh dev, came against Sirius [Tishtar]; both happened to be of equal strength and of equal vigour. Therefore, astrologers say "Mercury is beneficent with the beneficent ones, and maleficent with the maleficent ones. There are some who say so: 'Apaosh is not Mercury.'"

D. N. McKenzie has written a book available for online viewing and as a pdf download titled Zoroastrian Astrology in the Bundahishn.

Visit our page at: http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/
and our blog Astrology & Cosmology - Zoroastrian Heritage

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

God, Time & Creation in Zoroastrianism According to the Dinkard

The Middle Persian Zoroastrian texts referred to below: the Greater Bundahishn and Dinkard (also spelt Denkart) were written in the Pahlavi script between the 6th and 9th centuries CE. While the Bundahishn gives us a mythical account of creation, parts of the Dinkard seek to convey a more philosophical approach to understanding creation.

R. C. Zaehner in his book Zurvan: A Zoroastrian Dilemma states that there is a remarkable statement in section 18 of the Greater Bundahishn.

Khoda: Lord (of Creation)
The section states that before the act of creation, Ohrmazd (as God was called in Medieval Middle Persian texts - derived from the original term Ahura Mazda) was not Khvatay (meaning, according to Zaehner, 'Lord', or more literally 'having power of one's own'. Lord, or for that matter being sovereign, are inadequate human terms that seek to bring understanding to the incomprehensible. We should not equate Ohrmazd as something akin to a human lord).

Perhaps, we can derive from this, that existence needed to exist to enable cosmic laws (asha), that bring order to existence, to be relevant. In more prosaic terms, without existence there was nothing on which to apply the laws, i.e. nothing to be 'lord' over.

[Note: Khuda (or Khoda) is the New Persian form of Khvatay, the ordinary word for God. Our note: Khvatay may be connected to Khshathra - the quality of being sovereign and having dominion].

It was only after Ohrmazd's act of creation that Ohrmazd, God, became Khvatay - Lord Sovereign / self-governed.

Time: Finite & Infinite
Continuing his examination of the Bundahishn, Zaehner notes that Ohrmazd's act of creation of the material existence started with the fashioning of zaman i derang-Khvatay, time-period of the long dominion, which the Bundahishn notes is also called by some as finite time (zaman i kanarakomand or zaman i brin) from infinite time (zaman i akanarak).

[Note: zaman i derang-Khvatay (Mid. Pers.) = zravanahe daregho khvadhatahe or khadhatahe / hvadhatahe (Avestan). zaman i akanarak (Mid. Pers.) = zravanahe akarnahe (Avestan)]

Zaehner goes on to note that at the end of the cosmic period (at the end of finite time), finite time will reintegrate with infinite time from which it had originated. Middle Persian philosopher / theologian Mardan-Farrukh took strong exception to the idea that the infinite can under any circumstances become finite, or that infinite time was created, and stated that this interpretation of the Avesta was a perversion. Rather, as an integral aspect of God, infinite time is uncreated. Further, God, Ohrmazd, in the act of creation, fashioned time of long dominion (finite time) out of the Creator's own infiniteness.

The creation of finite time was necessary in order for existence to exist and eventually to set the material creation in motion.

Evtak Menog: Undifferentiated Spiritual Existence
The primal existence is undifferentiated menog (mainyu) spiritual existence - described in the Dinkard (Dinkard Madon or DkM p. 98-100) as being single (evtak), uncompounded (a-hambut DkM 398.20) , devoid of parts (a-bahr DkM 399.4) invisible and intangible. In that existence, the spiritual light is one that casts no shadow.

Creation: Differentiated Existence
As a prelude to the creation of the material existence, the spiritual existence was differentiated as a pair (Gatha 30.2) that were 'twin, well-working'. The closest we can come to understanding the nature of the differentiated spirituality is a spiritual light and darkness. The resulting duality would henceforth be fundamental to the nature of existence.

Ras: Wheel of Existence
The instrument of creation is the ras, the wheel, the end-form of the endless-form, the space-time or vay(u)-zurvan / void-time continuum and primal element which enabled the physical existence, getig (gaetha) to be manifest. We are now provided with the concept of the wheel of existence, perhaps also implying metaphorically, the setting of existence in motion.

The void of space allows the material creation to have shape. In the cosmos, the ras is manifest as a sphere [the Greater Bundahishn also uses the metaphor that the cosmos, 'its ends exceedingly far apart (i.e. beyond our concept of enormity), in the shape of an egg.' It is also daregho khvadhatahe - immense and self-governing, but nevertheless limited (Greater Bundahishn 18.3-9)].

With the limitation of time, being / existence (hastih) becomes manifest (paytak) (Middle Persian Dinkard: Madan p. 131.21 - 133.9; Sanjana iii p. 152; Zaehner Z 15 p. 383).

Through time, matter has the potential of being actualized (Dinkard: Madan p. 207.1 - 7; Sanjana v p. 232; Zaehner Z 16 p. 384).

The Process of Becoming
Under the aegis of the fravashi (which carries the universal cosmic laws of asha) imbedded in every facet of the material creation, the formless time-space continuum started the self-regulated eon-long (daregho khvadhatahe) process of becoming (bavishn). The two passages in the Dinkard (Madon p. 133.2-6) that describe the process of becoming following the initial act of creation, make no mention of any continuing direct divine control or manipulation as creation evolved. In other words, after the initial act of creation, the balance of the process is self-governed (khadhata) and self-advancing.

According to Zaehner's reading of the Dinkard in his book The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism, the process of evolution after the initial act of creation proceeded in four steps:
  1. The start of becoming was accompanied by the formation of primal element, ras, the embodiment of space-time, unformed and the origin of all material forms.
  2. The process of becoming accompanied by the formation of mediary matter or 'potential form',
  3. The stabilization of becoming, and
  4. The realization of becoming accompanied by the formation of the material universe, getig, and emergence.
Zaehner informs us that these four steps are repeated several times in the Dinkard (Madon p. 202-3, 207-8) citing the authority 'as is said in the Religion,' and that the steps are also found in the Maitri Upanishad.

Manifestation of Duality
Upon the realization of becoming, the inherent duality of existence is manifest in ras, the wheel of existence, as pairs of being and not-being such as light and darkness (no-light), heat and cold (no-heat). In life, the duality is manifest as living life (gaem) and not-living (ajyaitim) cf. Gatha 30.4. Eventually in humans, this inherent duality of existence will manifest as right and wrong (not-right), good and evil (not-good) and then tangibly as asha and druj (Madon p. 208.21-2), good and evil, in human thoughts, words and deeds. (Compare: the yin-yang circle / wheel symbol.)

Ultimate Unity - the Impermanence of Spiritual and Temporal Existential Duality
Zoroastrianism does not see existential duality continuing without end. It sees the goal of existence as rising to a state of holistic perfection exemplified by the destruction of evil. Such a condition leads to a scenario where there is no ageing, no death, no fear and no violence. All forms of existential duality including light and darkness would cease to exist.

The absence of ageing could be said to assume that time itself will stand still bring to an end the regime of zravanahe daregho khvadhatahe - time of long dominion, time that can be measured. Perhaps, what will remain is zravanahe akarnahe - time infinite, unbounded and immeasurable - the form of time that existed before the institution of zravanahe daregho khvadhatahe. The existential space-time continuum of vayu-zravanahe will cease to exist.

One could therefore postulate that in one interpretation of Zoroastrian philosophy, existence rose from a unity and will end in a unity - duality having been the interim means for creation to have manifested itself and for humanity to progress from a state of imperfection to perfection.

In another interpretation, all souls will be cleansed and will return to God. In such an event, the spiritual and ethical duality of good and evil will cease not just in the temporal existence, but in the spiritual existence as well. All souls came from God and all souls will return to God. This is another way of saying that all existence rose from a unity and will return to a unity.

Duality & Dualism pages of this blog:
» Dual, Duality & Dualism. Definitions
» The Two - Ta Mainyu
» Yin-Yang Dualism. Development of the Concept
» Yin-Yang in Daoism / Taoism. The Daodejing by Laozi. Zhuangzi
» Plutarch. His Work, Duality and the Soul

Also see:
» The Difference between Ahura (Khoda), Mazda & Yazata (Yazdan) - Lord, God & Divine.

Visit our page at:
http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/