Friday, April 30, 2010

Zoroastrian Ethos

(Original page at http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/overview/simplified.htm#ethos)

In the Vaetha Nask, a Zoroastrian text, a question is asked about how a person can be recognized as a Zoroastrian. The answer given is through that person's good mind, intellect without deceitfulness, good speech and good actions. Middle Persian texts and travellers' observations about the shared characteristics of the Zoroastrians they encountered, provide us with additional information. The following are some traits and qualities that contributed to the reputation of Zoroastrians:
  • Persona: Grace, generosity of spirit, good manners.
  • Traits: Wisdom in thought, measured speech, and beneficent action.
  • Possessing six virtues: Reason, self-control, modesty, trustworthiness, gratitude, and hope.
  • Without six vices: Malice, anger, arrogance, deceitfulness, greed, and despair.
The Zoroastrian ethos was developed into a list of guiding principles that is read out during a Zoroastrian marriage ceremony. A condensed list of these guiding principles are provided in our page on marriages.

Amongst travellers' records are the observations of Johan Albrecht de Mandelslo, a German adventurer from 1638 CE, and those of an Anglican chaplain John Ovington in 1689 CE.

In the chronicles of his travels through Persia and India, Mandelslo writes that he saw the Zoroastrians of India, the Parsees, as 'diligent', 'conscientious' and 'skilful' in their work ethic.

John Ovington, a chaplain in the Royal Navy, reported in his work, Voyage to Surat published in 1696 CE, that in the Indian Gujerati city of Surat, Zoroastrians "assist the poor and are ready to provide for the sustenance and comfort of such as want it. Their universal kindness, either employing such as are ready and able to work, or bestowing a seasonable bounteous charity to such as are infirm and miserable, leave no man destitute of relief, nor suffer a beggar in all their tribe."

More recently, after a visit to Yazd Iran, Karl Vick wrote in a June 18, 2006 article in the Washington Post: "Zoroastrians appear to enjoy the most respect (by the majority Muslims from amongst the other rreligious minorities) inside Iran... Zoroastrians enjoy a vivid reputation for honesty. Prices in a shop owned by a Zoroastrian are regarded as the benchmark that competing shops are compared against. Children are told that when arriving in a strange town near dark, seek out a Zoroastrian home to spend the night in. 'I'm sorry to say it and it might sound offensive, but these Zoroastrians are better Muslims than we are,' said Mohammad Pardehbaff, a Yazd driver."

Visit our page at:
http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

When was the Avestan Canon Closed?

Question:
From: Tim McConnell
Subject: Avestan Canon closed (PLEASE HELP)

Could you explain to me when the Avestan canon was closed? I've heard different dates. Boyce said in the 500's BC but the Vendidad was written later than that. I don't understand.There are no precise dates available for the composition of the Avesta and the Vendidad. However, there are sufficient clues that indicate that some parts of the Vendidad were composed before 500 BCE.
_______________________________

Answer:
Dear Tim McConnell,

I will try and answer your question briefly here. Please do refer to the pages/links below for a further review.

There is a difference between the ‘composition’ of different parts of the Avesta and the ‘writing’ of the Avesta. The different parts of the Avesta were composed as verbal traditions considerably before the texts were committed to writing. Further, the written texts that we have today are in all likelihood different from the original written texts. Also please bear in mind, that if we were to reassemble and publish parts of the Avesta today, while the book may carry today’s date, the content’s creation may extend from today to a variety of indeterminate dates. In this manner the person who collated the texts that made up the Vendidad (or for that matter some of the Yashts) may very well have used very old texts and combined it with more recent texts.

While we cannot give the writing of the Vendidad a precise date, we have some clues about the latest time-frame when some portions were composed. One of these clues can be found in the Vendidad’s first chapter. This chapter lists sixteen nations (http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/aryans/airyanavaeja.htm#avesta). Persia and Media (Western Iran in general), which became important centres of the Zoroastrian religion are not mentioned in this list. http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/achaemenian/index.htm#entry

Given that the sixteen Vendidad nations radiate from Central Asia, it is also significant that Khairizem / Khvarizem (Chorasmia), another important Zoroastrian centre is not explicitly part of the sixteen nations (though its territory could have been part of say Urva or Sughdha). Khairizem is, however, mentioned in Verse 10.14 of the Avesta's Mehr Yasht. Also see http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/khvarizem/index.htm#texts.

The observations above lead us to surmise that what is today the Vendidad’s first chapter was composed before the creation of Persia, Media and Khairizem as kingdom-states. However, it is quite possible that some following chapters of the Vendidad were composed at a later date. Some authors create an inherent bias in their writings by trying to be too precise in their allocation of dates (which are speculative at best). If they establish 1000 BCE as the approximate date for the time when Zarathushtra lived, they are compelled to use 500 BCE as the date for the composition of the Vendidad – since that is around when Persia came into existence and because they need to allocate some centuries for the change in the language from Gathic Avestan to later Avestan. However, Media is mentioned in Assyrian texts dated to 844 BCE (http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/medians/index.htm#secondphase). It is also unreasonable to assume that the Vendidad’s first chapter was composed precisely before the formation of Media. Nations take time to form. The first chapter could therefore have origins before 1000 BCE; the chapter on Yima / King Jamshid has pre-Zoroastrian roots, while subsequent Vendidad chapters could have been composed at later dates.

With the information currently available to us, we cannot establish dates for the composition of the Avesta and the closing of the Avestan canon.

I hope this helps.

Regards

K. E. Eduljee

Visit our page at:
http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/

Disposal of Organic Waste - Environmental Protection

Question:
From: E.De-Haes

Dear Sir, Madam,

I am writing to you as a Mature Student in Theology and Religious Studies at the University of Winchester, in the UK.

We are presently studying Integrated Spirituality, a module that examines how the body and soul are related in the different world religions. This entails examining whether these are considered separate or unified in each tradition.

We are presently studying Zoroastrianism.

We have learned about the death rituals and much about the complex and ancient body purification rituals. An intriguing question has arisen, however, regarding how cut nails and cut hair are disposed of, since they cannot be allowed to pollute the earth, water nor fire. We wondered whether perhaps a special lead container exists for this purpose and if so, what it is called, where it is kept in the home, and how the items in it are ultimately disposed of.

I would be very interested to receive your response regarding this question, if you are willing to provide it. If not, I shall not take offence and shall understand that, for whatever reasons, you wish not to reply to this question.

Yours respectfully,

Elizabeth de Haes
__________________________________

Answer:
Dear Elizabeth de Haes,

The short answer to your question regarding the disposal of hair and nails is that today, the vast majority of Zoroastrians dispose of hair and nails in the same manner as anyone else, that is, with household garbage.

Rather than being preoccupied with the specific issue of hairs and nails, Zoroastrians today are more concerned with general environmental protection, and use as a guiding principle, a desire to minimize any harmful impact of human and household waste on the environment. The first guiding principle is to generate as little household waste as possible. Then, if there is a method of disposing waste available that will have the least harmful impact (and perhaps even a beneficial impact), on the environment, Zoroastrians are guided by their ethical tradition to choose that option. The ethical imperative is beneficence over harm. The method of waste disposal is therefore dynamic and various generations of Zoroastrians have used different approaches. There are also regional differences.

In the old days - when independent Zoroastrian communities existed - all organic human waste was deposited in stone lined pits where it naturally degraded aided by a bleaching action of the sun (khursheed nigerishn) and often with the addition of lime. This worked especially well in the drier rocky areas where Zoroastrianism originated. The intent here was not to dispose of the waste in rivers, in land where pollutants could leach into the ground, or by burning, into the air. For domestic wastes, houses had adjacent pits (see Vendidad 17.2.1). Community waste and bodies were placed in separate designated areas.

Since it would have been difficult for nomads or otherwise unsettled peoples to implement this system, a settled "civilized" life was considered the ideal.

Today, with Zoroastrians scattered as minorities throughout the world, the tradition of waste disposal in stone or stone-lined pits is, sadly, seldom implemented.

Please understand that Zoroastrians by and large do not refer to the scriptures for prescriptions and prohibitions. Zoroastrianism is for the main part a religion based on traditions - traditions that are transmitted through the family, elders and collective community wisdom.

The translation of Zoroastrian religious texts into a language that can be understood by the laity is a relatively recent phenomenon. A couple of hundred years ago, even the priesthood had a vague, but not precise knowledge of the meaning of the scriptures. Nevertheless, before the scriptures were committed to written texts, the priests faithfully memorized the scriptures and we are indebted to them for preserving these scriptures.

Our understanding of the Zoroastrian scriptures is based on various translations. Please do not assume that these translations are accurate. While there is consensus that certain translated sections effectively convey the intended meaning, there is considerable dispute over other sections. Some translations of certain parts of the Vendidad are disputed.

The text that prohibits the improper disposal of hair and nails is Chapter 17 of the Vendidad. This section is one of the most recently written of all the Zoroastrian scriptures. The language in which it was composed is of "a late and degenerate state of the (Avestan) language" (Dr. Pallan Ichaporia).

The focus of the so-called purity laws of the Vendidad is cleanliness and prevention of the spread of disease. Zoroastrian priests, who also functioned as health providers, wore white clothing and masks over their faces long before this tradition was adopted by doctors throughout the world. Organic waste was seen as a breeding ground for disease that could lead to death. Therefore, improperly disposed organic waste was seen as an agent of disease and possibly death. Death-promoting is viewed as the antithesis of life-nurturing. Tradition tells us that in ancient times, Zoroastrian communities were the cleanest, most sanitary and healthiest from amongst surrounding communities. Together with a system of civic order and just laws, they were one of the most desirable places to live.

With the modern availability of translated texts, Zoroastrians have developed a diversity of ideas from liberal to reformist to traditional - and the texts are interpreted from these points of view. However, there is one common denominator (or an element of consistency) that pervades all these differences - the ethical imperative to be beneficent and a respect, indeed a reverence, for the environment.

We hope this helps you in your studies and we will be interested to hear your response.

All the best in your studies,

Regards,

K. E. Eduljee
______________________________________

On April 29, 2010, Shirinmai J. Mistry wrote on mainstreamzoroastrians@yahoo.com:

Mr K. E. Eduljee always writes so lucidly and well. His researches are exemplary and I hope he continues with enlightening the world in his sane and sensible style!

(Added in a followup post:) ...in one of Professor Mary Boyce's books, she mentions how the villagers in Iran would gather their cut nails, tie them in a little bundle and send them off to a designated place. I seem to recall one had to climb a small ladder and thrust the remains into a hole as if down a chimney. Perhaps the male youngsters did their solemn duty by being entrusted with this task.
Thanks Cy, for this transmition.
ShirinMAI!
______________________________________

On July 7, 2010, Elizabeth de Haes wrote:

Dear K.E. Eduljee,

I want to thank you heartily for the trouble you took to provide me with such useful information regarding your religion. It gave me a subtle insight and an understanding of Zoroastrianism that I had not been able to obtain from books. I hope you don't mind if I posted your comments on a special 'Wiki' (a sort of internal website, specific to my university and to my course) to share with my classmates. Both my lecturer and my classmates found the information helpful and enlightening for it gave us the means to argue that Zoroastrianism is probably, in many ways, the most 'ecological' religion of all. Many thanks for providing us all with the information to make such observations possible. I greatly appreciated the fact that you took so much time to answer my initial question.

I understand that for various reasons Zoroastrianism is slowly declining. I find that this is a loss for our world, for Zoroastrianism appears to me to be one of the most beautiful and intelligent religions.

With best regards,

Elizabeth de Haes


Visit our page at:
http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/